Share

Admin Note: After some further discussion with MSH, I also provided her with the following information. MSH stated under duress she had to sign admission papers saying they would only use particular physicians. I provided this information in hopes that it would be of help to her, and to you if you find yourself in similar circumstances.

I shared certain portions of the federal regulations and the guidance to surveyors with MSH that applied to her situation. The regulation itself is in black, the information in purple is not the regulation, but is guidance CMS uses to interpret the regulation, and my statements are in blue

The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. A facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident, including each of the following rights

 

All residents in long term care facilities have rights guaranteed to them under Federal and State law. Requirements concerning resident rights are specified in §§483.10, 483.12, 483.13, and 483.15. Section 483.10 is intended to lay the foundation for the remaining resident’s rights requirements which cover more specific areas.

These rights include the resident’s right to:
Exercise his or her rights (§483.10(a));
Be informed about what rights and responsibilities he or she has (§483.10(b));
If he or she wishes, have the facility manage his personal funds (§483.10(c));
Choose a physician and treatment and participate in decisions and care planning (§483.10(d));  

 

§483.10(d)(1) Free Choice – The resident has the right to choose a personal attending physician

The right to choose a personal physician does not mean that the physician must or will serve the resident, or that a resident must designate a personal physician. If a physician of the resident’s choosing fails to fulfill a given requirement, such as §483.25(l)(1), Unnecessary drugs; §483.25(l)(2), Antipsychotic drugs; or §483.40, frequency of physician visits, the facility will have the right, after informing the resident, to seek alternate physician participation to assure provision of appropriate and adequate care and treatment. A facility may not place barriers in the way of residents choosing their own physicians. For example, if a resident does not have a physician, or if the resident’s physician becomes unable or unwilling to continue providing care to the resident, the facility must assist the resident in exercising his or her choice in finding another physician.

Before consulting an alternate physician, one mechanism to alleviate a possible problem could involve the facility’s utilization of a peer review process for cases which cannot be satisfactorily resolved by discussion between the medical director and the attending physician. Only after a failed attempt to work with the attending physician or mediate differences in delivery of care should the facility request an alternate physician when requested to do so by the resident or when the physician will not adhere to the regulations.

If it is a condition for admission to a continuing care retirement center (CCR), the requirement for free choice is met if a resident is allowed to choose a personal physician from among those who have practice privileges at the retirement center. (If the facility your loved one is at is not a CCR then this paragraph does not apply – and he/she should not be required to choose from a certain set of physicians)

A resident in a distinct part of a general acute care hospital can choose his/her own physician, unless the hospital requires that physicians with residents in the distinct part have hospital admitting privileges. If this is so, the resident can choose his/her own physician, but cannot have a physician who does not have hospital admitting privileges.

If you feel what they are doing is in violation of this information (they are not allowing the choice of physician), then I suggest you call in a complaint to the department of health for your state, the division that oversees the licensing and certification of nursing homes.

Tags: , , , , ,

One Response to “More info shared with MSH about Regulations in Nursing Homes”

  1. Mark Says:

    I would suggest she speak with the administrator first for 2 reasons: #1 – Your first report should always be to the administrator of any issue you feel where your rights are being violated. Bottom line. The administrator is actually in charge of correcting those issues. Whereas a complaint to the dept of health will only serve to generate a deficiency. It then goes back to the administrator who is still responsible for correcting the problem.

    #2 – To find out which physicians will actually follow her to the facility. As you know, there are many docs that don’t want to deal with nursing homes and will hand off their patients to the medical director as soon as they enter a NH/SNF. You can choose your physician all day long, but if the physician refuses to follow you, then here’s a list of physicians who come to this facility.

Leave a Reply